Cases 21 - 30 of 160
SCOTTO v. MAIMONIDES et al
as 2:2022cv03626
Plaintiff:
LIVIA SCOTTO
Defendant:
MAIMONIDES, UNITED STATES, SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN LEHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FOSTER v. SLOMSKY et al
as 2:2022cv03349
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D. FOSTER
Defendant:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, CLERKS TO BE NAMED, LANDON Y. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWIS v. DMH INVESTMENTS LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03207
Plaintiff:
Racquel Lewis
Defendant:
DMH Investments LLC, City of Philadelphia and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA OFFICE OF HOMELESS SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
TOLBERT v. WEINER et al
as 2:2022cv01228
Plaintiff:
KEITH TOLBERT
Defendant:
DR. STEPHEN WEINER, MANDY SIPPLE, ANN LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILLOCK PROPERTIES LLC et al v. COUNTY OF DELAWARE
as 2:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
HILLOCK PROPERTIES LLC, SOUTH AVENUE LIMITED PARTNERS, HILLOCK REAL ESTATE LLC and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
LEWIS-DAVIS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2021cv04052
Plaintiff:
RACQUEL LEWIS-DAVIS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
