Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 242
AYERS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv04339
Plaintiff: KEVIN AYERS
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN QUINN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEWDNEY v. TABAS AND ROSEN, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv02865
Plaintiff: W. DEWDNEY
Defendant: TABAS AND ROSEN, P.C., X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCKEOWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv02475
Plaintiff: MICHELLE MCKEOWN
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT. , ROBERT ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02114
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JOHNSON v. FUBER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01869
Plaintiff: THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant: WILLIAM J. FUBER, JR., KELLY WALL, DOMESTIC RELATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00834
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SMALL v. DENMARK et al
as 2:2016cv00452
Plaintiff: ISAIAH SMALL
Defendant: DANIEL DENMARK, JOHN DOES 1-10, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLCOMB v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv06834
Plaintiff: ADANO HOLCOMB
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SEAN CAVE and POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv06157
Plaintiff: MICHAEL W. HUGHS
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES SQUARES, JAMIE MILES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
COHN v. MANGOLD et al
as 2:2015cv06168
Plaintiff: BRIAN JAMES
Defendant: PATRICK MANGOLD , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?