Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02249
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
GORDON v. BINGHAM et al
as 5:2022cv04996
Plaintiff: JOHN GORDON
Defendant: JONATHAN B. BINGHAM, LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK, AMERIHEALTH CARITAS PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2022cv03771
Plaintiff: GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant: CITY OF LANCASTER doing business as LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU and JACOB BINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 2:2022cv03771
Plaintiff: GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant: CITY OF LANCASTER and JACOB BINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RUIZ-RIVERA v. CITY AND COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv02105
Defendant: POLICE OFFICER LAPP, POLICE OFFICER JACOB BINGHAM, FICTITIOUS DESIGNATION and others
Plaintiff: IVAN RUIZ-RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNSIDE v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2019cv00017
Defendant: CITY OF LANCASTER, TIMOTHY SINNOTT and JACOB BINGHAM
Plaintiff: DAMIN BURNSIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2017cv03314
Plaintiff: FRANK BRETT
Defendant: SETH WILLIAMS, CAPE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER "THE BOSS, DAVID SAMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. UNKNOWN et al
as 2:2013cv04522
Plaintiff: FRANK BRETT
Defendant: GARY UNKNOWN, EDDIE, MRS. STEPHANIE BINGHAM LAPUTA'S COUSIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BRETT v. FUMO et al
as 2:2008cv05080
Plaintiff: FRANK BRETT
Defendant: VINCENT FUMO, RUTH ARMAO, CAROLYN ZIMI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?