Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
RANDOLPH v. ACT #2 CHRISTIAN TRANSITIONAL SERVICES, ET AL. et al
as 2:2023cv02486
Plaintiff: TABETHA RANDOLPH
Defendant: ACT #2 CHRISTIAN TRANSITIONAL SERVICES, ET AL., SALVATION ARMY GREATER and STATION HOUSE TRANSITION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02964
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02963
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02010
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00733
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00074
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04939
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MADISON v. SHIRLEY et al
as 2:2010cv01924
Plaintiff: YVETTE MADISON
Defendant: ELIZA SHIRLEY, SALVATION ARMY and MARILYN CANTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2008cv01424
Plaintiff: IRVING COURTLEY JONES
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, COLUMBUS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT and SALVATION ARMY REED HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00099
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?