Cases 11 - 20 of 30
BAKER v. PA DOC et al
as 2:2021cv05352
Plaintiff:
JAMES BAKER
Defendant:
PA DOC, SCI FAYETTE, SCI GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOONE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05362
Plaintiff:
LAMONT BOONE
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, PA. DOC PHX INMATE TRANSPORTATION and SCI-PHX MED/DEPT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACON v. SMOKLE et al
as 2:2021cv02929
Defendant:
ZULKOWIS, SGT. SWEENY, DOC ASSIAAST MCCOWN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MACON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY v. PA DOC et al
as 2:2020cv04413
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER CONNOR COUNCIL, MR. SHELBY, EASON and others
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM HARRIS and SHAHEED KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN v. WETZEL
as 5:2019cv04945
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA DOC, WETZEL
Petitioner:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gantz v. PA DOC Secretary et al
as 2:2019cv01063
Respondent:
PA DOC Secretary, SUPERINTENDENT JOHN WETZEL and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner:
PARIS LAVAR GANTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gantz v. PA DOC Secretary et al
as 5:2019cv01063
Respondent:
PA DOC Secretary, SUPERINTENDENT JOHN WETZEL and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner:
PARIS LAVAR GANTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MEEKINS v. DOC's GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv00851
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAZZ MEEKINS
Defendant:
DOC's GRATERFORD, JOHN AND JANE DOE, J. HAWK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHIMENTI et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS (DOC) et al
as 2:2015cv03333
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE CHIMENTI , DANIEL LEYVA and DAVID MALDONADO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS (DOC) , JOHN WETZEL , PAUL NOEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. DOC CENTRAL OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv02561
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant:
DOC CENTRAL OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
