Cases 21 - 30 of 20,772
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA. et al
as 5:2024cv01730
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA., BRIDGE OF HOPE CHURCH, ERIC MUHLENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2024cv01731
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DA JANE DOE, MARLIN ZIMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA. et al
as 5:2024cv01736
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA., ERIC MUHLENBERG, CHRISTY BILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2024cv01737
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and DA JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERENATO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA
as 2:2024cv02609
Petitioner:
DAVID M. BERENATO
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. HENDERSON et al
as 2:2024cv02599
Plaintiff:
TRAY ROBINSON
Defendant:
HENDERSON, LOVE, KOSHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURTIS v. LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2024cv02602
Plaintiff:
KEYONTAE D. CURTIS
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02644
Plaintiff:
KASHAMBA JOHN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MORRISON v. WASHINGTON
as 2:2024cv02531
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MORRISON
Respondent:
M WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
IN RE: DAVID TURNER
as 2:2024cv02546
Petitioner:
DAVID TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
