Cases 41 - 50 of 60
FENNELL v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2019cv01972
Defendant:
DAVID COLLINS, C.O. BAKER, C.O. CROWLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMARCUS FENNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. DOYLE et al
as 2:2019cv01588
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK, JOHN WETZEL, R. DOYLE and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRAYTON v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM et al
as 5:2019cv01265
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL A. DRAYTON, II
Defendant:
MAIL BOOKING PROPERTY DPT, JANINE QUIGLEY, DANIEL VAN BILLIARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON v. LERNER et al
as 2:2019cv01061
Defendant:
OFFICER BUCCHERI, OFFICER RITCHIE, CAPTAIN FREDERICKS and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE T. HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOATS v. ALGARIAN et al
as 2:2019cv00879
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MOATS
Defendant:
C.O. PLASCO, CAPTAIN LANKTON and JULIO M. ALGARIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASSAQUOI v. CAPTAIN HASKINS, ET AL.
as 2:2019cv00483
Respondent:
CAPTAIN HASKINS, ET AL.
Petitioner:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FENNELL et al v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2019cv00111
Plaintiff:
TERRELL BERKLEY, KENNETH SERNOBLE, GABRIEL LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT GOLDY, LIEUTENANT HENNINGER, CAPTAIN MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. CLARK et al
as 2:2018cv05315
Defendant:
RICHARD DOYLE, UNKNOWN PSYCHIATRIST, R. LADONNE and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VICTORY v. BERKS COUNTY et al
as 5:2018cv05170
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DROZACK, KEVIN S. BARNHARDT, C.O. REICHART and others
Plaintiff:
THERESA VICTORY, AMARA SANDERS and SAMANTHA HUNTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOCKLEY-BYRD v. ZAMBRANA et al
as 2:2018cv04845
Plaintiff:
TERRELL SHOCKLEY-BYRD
Defendant:
WARDEN EDWARD D. MCFADDEN, CAPTAIN SERGI and SGT. ZAMBRANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
