Cases 41 - 50 of 20,690
GOMEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2024cv01227
Defendant:
SCI CHESTER, CO3 LT. MR. POSADA, COMMONWEALTH OF PA and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIER GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLDNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOLDNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
COHEN v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
KEITH A. COHEN
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP, BENSALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, BENSALEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KONATA v. RAMOS et al
as 2:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
MATTHEWS KONATA
Defendant:
RAMOS, ABDUR-RAZZAQ, HOSKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNCAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DUNCAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LARRY KRASNER and JOSH MAYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
as 2:2024cv01846
Plaintiff:
JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. LACOLMB et al
as 2:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
PIERRE LACOLMB, C/O GINDRAW, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: QUINZEL CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
QUINZEL CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stovall v. Warden of SCI-Muncy et al
as 2:2024cv01839
Petitioner:
ARCELIA TRUMAINE STOVALL
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Muncy and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. BRIGGZ et al
as 2:2024cv01813
Plaintiff:
DUPREE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GREGORY BRIGGZ, C.O. ROBINSON, SAVASIA CARABALLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
