Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 61 - 70 of 162
BANKS v. KENDRA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00329
Plaintiff: MARVIN BANKS
Defendant: KENDRA, PEGGY, SAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON-KELLY v. CFCF
as 2:2016cv04535
Plaintiff: MARCUS C PEARSON-KELLY
Defendant: CFCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2016cv04425
Petitioner: KELLY ANDERSON
Respondent: LAWRENCE MAHALLY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KELLY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03440
Plaintiff: THEODORE KELLY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
KELLY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03330
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: JAMES KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DOE v. DOE et al
as 2:2016cv01038
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE
Defendant: JANE DOE, BARB DOE, BILL DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEY v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2016cv01039
Plaintiff: ERNEST KEY
Defendant: MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE, MICHAEL P. GORDON and KELLY ANNE TOPELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv00549
Plaintiff: JEFFREY L. COOPER
Defendant: GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FRANK GREEN, GRIFFITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. CONINA et al
as 2:2016cv00021
Plaintiff: KELLY GIBSON
Defendant: MARRY CONINA, JOHN WEZTLE and TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UPSHUR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv04688
Plaintiff: ALBERT UPSHUR
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?