Cases 1 - 10 of 20,758
WILLIAMS v. P.A. PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv02669
Petitioner:
TYRICK WILLIAMS
Respondent:
P.A. PAROLE BOARD, J. RIVELLO, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEWIS v. BRANTLEY et al
as 2:2024cv02673
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CARLTON LEWIS
Defendant:
BRANTLEY, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: CHARKETA REID
as 2:2024cv02679
Plaintiff:
CHARKETA REID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02644
Plaintiff:
KASHAMBA JOHN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tiburcio v. ADAMS
as 5:2024cv02617
Petitioner:
Juan Tiburcio
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
BERENATO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA
as 2:2024cv02609
Petitioner:
DAVID M. BERENATO
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRAYBOY v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2024cv02604
Plaintiff:
RODRICK MAURICE BRAYBOY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURTIS v. LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2024cv02602
Plaintiff:
KEYONTAE D. CURTIS
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DARBY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02596
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE DARBY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROBINSON v. HENDERSON et al
as 2:2024cv02599
Plaintiff:
TRAY ROBINSON
Defendant:
HENDERSON, LOVE, KOSHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
