Cases 1 - 10 of 25
MURRAY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
BRUCE MURRAY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LEON LUBIEJEWSKI, JAMES MCNESBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COULSTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04077
Plaintiff:
TROY COULSTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, KAREN ANSEL, CHARLES BENTHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PERSON v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2020cv00206
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and TAMMY FERGUSON
Petitioner:
DARIAN PERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARPER v. HARRELL et al
as 2:2017cv05603
Plaintiff:
IRVIN HARPER
Defendant:
KELLY HARRELL, LARRY KRASNER, DANIAL OMALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. PERSON
as 2:2016cv05287
Plaintiff:
JAMIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN N. PERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CREDICO v. PROTHONOTARY OF COMMONWEALTH COURT et al
as 2:2016cv04704
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CREDICO
Defendant:
PROTHONOTARY OF COMMONWEALTH COURT, UKNOWN PERSONS OF COMMONWEALTH COURT and COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. PERSON et al
as 2:2016cv03552
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
JOHN PERSON and SUPREME COURT OF PENN.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMSTOCK et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2015cv05611
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JAMES COMSTOCK, BRANDON J. COMSTOCK and BRANDON COMSTOCK
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JAILS, INSTITUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERSONS v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2015cv05075
Petitioner:
RANDY PERSONS
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, GIORLA and FARREL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PERSONS v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2015cv04298
Plaintiff:
RANDY PERSONS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, LOUIS GIORLA, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
