Cases 151 - 160 of 326,762
EDWARDS v. WESTROCK CP LLC
as 2:2024cv03224
Defendant:
WESTROCK CP LLC
Plaintiff:
KIRK EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BATCHELOR v. SIMMONDS
as 2:2024cv04981
Defendant:
J SIMMONDS
Plaintiff:
STEFAN BATCHELOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NORMAN v. PERPAY, INC.
as 2:2024cv04883
Plaintiff:
WAYNE H. NORMAN
Defendant:
PERPAY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
AMRHEIN v. LIBERTY MUTUAL PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv03321
Plaintiff:
CECILY AMRHEIN
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MOUNTAIN STATES PRESSURE SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2024cv04921
Unknown:
MOUNTAIN STATES PRESSURE SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
DIAMOND HANDS CAPITAL, INC. v. STRONG BUSINESS, SA et al
as 2:2024cv04911
Plaintiff:
DIAMOND HANDS CAPITAL, INC.
Defendant:
STRONG BUSINESS, SA doing business as CH Promotions and SBC COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Ozler v. PLA LOGISTICS INC. et al
as 5:2024cv04926
Plaintiff:
Alper Ozler
Defendant:
TAKATA TRANS, INC. and PLA LOGISTICS INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
NIMMO v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04913
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY NIMMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DOUGHTY v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04927
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DONALD DOUGHTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
