Cases 11 - 20 of 32
TAGGART v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. TAGGART
Defendant:
GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. GMAC MORTGAGE et al
as 5:2012cv00151
Defendant:
GMAC MORTGAGE and PHELAN HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLC
Plaintiff:
SIMONA ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
THROM v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
as 2:2011cv06813
Plaintiff:
DENNIS A. THROM
Defendant:
GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
CRONK v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
as 2:2011cv05161
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH CRONK
Defendant:
GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
WILLIAMS et al v. HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL LLC et al
as 2:2011cv03706
Plaintiff:
DAISHA WILLIAMS and ZAKI BEY
Defendant:
HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL LLC, GEORGE WESTALL, GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORMAN v. MORTGAGEIT et al
as 2:2011cv00139
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. ORMAN
Defendant:
MORTGAGEIT, CITIMORTGAGE , GMAC MORTGAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC et al v. TAGGART
as 2:2010cv02393
Plaintiff:
GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC , EAGLE NATIONWIDE MORTGAGE COMPANY and LBA FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
KENNETH J. TAGGART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01141
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
