Cases 11 - 20 of 324,150
MACKEY v. MALIK et al
as 2:2024cv02500
Plaintiff:
USHA MACKEY
Defendant:
MANISH MALIK and DEEPTI RAYBAGKAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
HASSELL v. THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02499
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HASSELL
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, LLC and THE LENFEST INSTITUTE FOR JOURNALISM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 133
DEVINE v. THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, LLC
as 2:2024cv02503
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEVINE
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
SANTIAGO v. PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 et al
as 2:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
DAVID T. SANTIAGO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 and BNI AGENT JOHN/JANE DOE 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
