Cases 21 - 30 of 96
RUFF v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2020cv00512
Petitioner:
ROBERT RUFF
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2020cv00359
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
JAITEE L. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2019cv05954
Respondent:
NIKKI CAMPBELL, BUREAU OF PRISONS, JONATHAN HENSHAW and others
Petitioner:
ELWOOD THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLHOUSE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv05139
Petitioner:
JOHN DOE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv03560
Defendant:
MS. BESTEDO, CHRISTINE NELSON, DR. ODEIDA DALMASI and others
Plaintiff:
TERENCE D. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FITZGERALD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2019cv01385
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Petitioner:
HAROLD FITZGERALD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MONROE v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2019cv01345
Petitioner:
RODNEY MONROE
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SANDERS v. MARLER et al
as 2:2018cv05477
Defendant:
R. SMITH, SPECIAL INVESTIGATIVE SECTION/SERVICES (S.I.S.) DEPT. AND STAFF, WARDEN SEAN MARLER and others
Plaintiff:
ROCMON L. SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK et al
as 2:2018cv01699
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON and DOJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETTIWAY v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv05784
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PETTIWAY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. MARSHALLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
