Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 61 - 70 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03247
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BRETT v. BRENEN et al
as 5:2012cv02964
Plaintiff: FRANK BRETT
Defendant: FELICIA BRENEN, GIORVINO, DAVID HILVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FRANK BRETT V. TIA MARIE GIORGINI, ET AL
as 2:2012cv01571
Plaintiff: FRANK BRETT
Defendant: TIA MARIE GIORGINI, TIA MARIE BARBAS, DAWN & ROBERT LAWFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IMES-MOSLEY v. CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07098
Plaintiff: FELICIA IMES-MOSLEY
Defendant: CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC., NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA and AIG DOMESTIC ACCIDENT & HEALTH DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BRETT v. IZZI et al
as 2:2011cv05969
Plaintiff: FRANK BRETT
Defendant: FRANK IZZI, FELICIA BRUNO and BILL SHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SOSDJAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv02969
Plaintiff: JON SOSDJAN
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and NED FELICIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOSEPH et al v. NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61040
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER JOSEPH and FELICIA DENISE JOSEPH
Defendant: NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2010cv07437
Plaintiff: JACOB F. MITCHELL
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , ISAM ELAYAN , SADIE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
SAWYER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv05303
Plaintiff: FELICIA I. SAWYER
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAHAN v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv03874
Plaintiff: FELICIA D. MAHAN
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?