Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Grosklos v. York Railway Company et al
as 1:2012cv02088
Plaintiff:
Phillip C. Grosklos
Defendant:
York Railway Company, Genesee & Wyoming, Inc. and Rail Link, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Santanna v. Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01240
Plaintiff:
Ermond Santanna
Defendant:
Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Margavage v. Norfolk Southern Railway, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01226
Plaintiff:
Bruce C Margavage
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway, Inc., Consolidated Rail Corporation and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
NIKLAUS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 4:2012cv00811
Plaintiff:
James W. Niklaus
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
STARNER v. PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2011cv01789
Plaintiff:
Randy Starner
Defendant:
Penn Central Corporation , Consolidated Rail Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
McAndrew v. Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01727
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey McAndrew
Defendant:
Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Hinkle v. Gruver et al
as 1:2011cv01224
Plaintiff:
Anne M. Hinkle
Defendant:
James W. Gruver, Thomas L. Ginnick , George Bauserman, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Holleran v. Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00517
Plaintiff:
Edward Roger Holleran
Defendant:
Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLLERAN v. CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY
as 3:2010cv02418
Plaintiff:
Tom Holleran
Defendant:
Canadian Pacific Railway
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Holleran v. Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.
as 3:2010cv02179
Plaintiff:
Edward Roger Holleran
Defendant:
Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
