Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lundy v. Lenning et al
as 3:2021cv01767
Plaintiff:
Steven Love Lundy and Steven Love Lundy Trust
Defendant:
Kenneth Lenning, Matthew Nero, E. David Chtristine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundy v. Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv01898
Defendant:
District Attorney E. David Christine, Monroe County Courthouse/District Attorney's Office, Judge Jonathan Mark and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Love Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lundy v. Pocono Mountain Regional Police Officers et al
as 3:2018cv00761
Plaintiff:
Steven Love Lundy
Defendant:
Pocono Mountain Regional Police Officers, Kenneth Lenning, Matthew Nero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundy v. Monroe County District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2017cv02255
Plaintiff:
Steven Love Lundy and Estefania Duran
Defendant:
Monroe County District Attorney's Office and Michael Mancuso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lundy v. Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department et al
as 3:2017cv02256
Plaintiff:
Steven Love Lundy
Defendant:
Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department and Lucas David Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundy v. Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department et al
as 3:2017cv02199
Plaintiff:
Steven Love Lundy
Defendant:
Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department, Kenny Lenning, Matthew Nero and others
Amicu:
Mark Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeRaffele v. City of Williamsport et al
as 4:2015cv00572
Plaintiff:
John DeRaffele
Defendant:
City of Williamsport , Gabriel Campana , Gregory Foresman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lundy v. Bray et al
as 3:2007cv00663
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Lundy
Defendant:
Lucas D. Bray, Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department, Pennsylvania District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
