Cases 101 - 110 of 17,786
Watkins v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Gerald Watkins
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poplawski v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Poplawski
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Prime Care Employees
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
John J Richardson
Defendant:
Prime Care Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Flory et al
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Richardson
Defendant:
Nurse Flory, Nurse Mallery, Nurse Leann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valoy v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Orlando V. Valoy
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Stokes v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Ralph Stokes
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uderra v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Jose Uderra
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramm v. USA
as 1:2024cv00589
Petitioner:
Karen E. Ramm
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Demuro-Correll v. Haidle et al
as 3:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Michael Demuro-Correll
Defendant:
Warden Haidle and Correctional Officer Kubic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swinson v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Lydell Swinson
Defendant:
CO Smith, Unit Manager Heenan, Unit Manager Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
