Cases 11 - 20 of 17,790
Brown v. Ricard
as 3:2024cv00921
Petitioner:
Mark Brown
Respondent:
Warden Ricard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gill v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00922
Petitioner:
Joseph Gill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zierke v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Gary Zierke
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Salsman v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00911
Petitioner:
Chad Michael Salsman
Respondent:
Superintendent Melinda Adams, Michelle A. Henry, Esquire and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giron v. Lowe et al
as 1:2024cv00900
Petitioner:
Jose Amendola Giron
Respondent:
Craig A. Lowe, Cammila Wamsley and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Youmans v. Nickolas et al
as 3:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Youmans
Defendant:
Wendy Nickolas, Ms. Lampert, Deborah Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Boose et al
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Raheem Johnson
Defendant:
Boose, CAPTAIN Baptiste, GRIEVANCE COUNSELOR Heist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolduc v. Arviza
as 1:2024cv00892
Petitioner:
Jason Donald Bolduc
Respondent:
M. Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Austin v. SCI-Dallas Mailroom Staff et al
as 4:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Shaun Austin
Defendant:
SCI-Dallas Mailroom Staff and Former Superintendent Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jones v. USA
as 1:2024cv00862
Petitioner:
George E. Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
