Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Keystone Alternatives LLC et al v. Athletes First, LLC. et al
as 1:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Keystone Alternatives LLC doing business as GOPSURV.com and Mark Lauer
Defendant:
Athletes First, LLC., Chris Longo, Trace Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Armstrong, Jr. v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
James Bernard Armstrong, Jr.
Respondent:
Collette Peters and J. Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Armstrong, Jr. v. Carvajal et al
as 3:2021cv01602
Petitioner:
James Bernard Armstrong, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael J. Carvajal, Scott Finley and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Laurenceau v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2021cv01351
Plaintiff:
Myrlene Laurenceau
Defendant:
David Armstrong and Pamela Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZAMICHIELI v. MIHAL et al
as 3:2021cv01246
Plaintiff:
Lamont Zamichieli
Defendant:
Betty Lou Mihal, Trojan, Lt. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolus v. Boockvar et al
as 3:2020cv01882
Defendant:
Cambria County Board of Elections, Indiana County Board of Elections, Montour County Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff:
Bob Bolus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armstrong v. Dauphin County Prison
as 1:2020cv01282
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Armstrong
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Briggs et al
as 1:2020cv01170
Respondent:
Warden Gregory Briggs and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Tyrone Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Cope et al v. A.I.I Acquisitions, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00728
Defendant:
Kolmar Laboratories, Inc., Unimin Corporation, Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Loretta Belac and Faith Belac Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
