Cases 111 - 120 of 11,800
SANCHEZ-LEON v. BARLETT
as 1:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
ROBERTO SANCHEZ-LEON
Respondent:
WARDEN S. BARLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CASTRO-MOTA v. CLAIRION BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
CLAIRION BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER OF POLICIES, SGT. OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNETT v. SUTTERS
as 1:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
JOMO BARNETT
Respondent:
MICHELLE HENRY and SUTTERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GERMANY v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 2:2024cv00588
Petitioner:
TYRONE GERMANY
Respondent:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER and MICHELLE A. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SARKISOV v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
EDUARD SARKISOV
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richard v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
CARL RICHARD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH, WELLPATH MEDICAL CO., DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
SHASTEEN v. BARTLETT
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
DAKOTA SHASTEEN
Respondent:
WARDEN BARTLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VIERA v. BARLETT
as 1:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
WIGBERTO VIERA
Respondent:
S. BARLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
