Cases 11 - 20 of 20,368
GARCIA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv09276
Plaintiff:
JULIA B. GARCIA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv01582
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
STEFFIE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv04941
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
LAUREN STEFFIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
VALE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRUCE VALE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ANGROS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
THOMAS EDMUND ANGROS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SCHUETZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv08035
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
AUDREY SCHUETZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TADROS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv09230
Plaintiff:
SANIR TADROS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
NILES, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv04920
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
CHESTER LLOYD NILES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ECKERT v. OMALLEY
as 5:2024cv04907
Plaintiff:
MARY ECKERT
Defendant:
MARTIN J. OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
SCHWARTZ v. OMALLEY
as 2:2024cv03234
Plaintiff:
JORDAN TYLER SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
