Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1357
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1355
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1356
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
City of Philadelphia v. Aisha Bradley, et al
as 24-1211
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO, JUDGE PATRICK F. DUGAN, State Employee and others
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST, GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Artis Carroll, Jr. v. George W Hill Correctional Facility, et al
as 22-8036
Petitioner:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
GEORGE W HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DELAWARE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, GEO GROUP INC and others
Artis Carroll, Jr. v. Delaware County Prison, et al
as 22-8035
Petitioner:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
DELAWARE COUNTY PRISON, GEORGE W HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DELAWARE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and others
Derrick Jacobs v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 21-2314
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK U. JACOBS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Kelly Conard v. Pennsylvania State Police, et al
as 20-3644
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT JOSEPH TRIPP, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and DENNIS HILE
Defendant:
PSP HUMAN RESOURCES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELLY CONARD
Derrick Jacobs v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 20-1967
Defendant / Appellee:
TRACY TRIPP, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK U. JACOBS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
