Cases 31 - 40 of 19,798
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KANTH v. PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
as 3:2024cv06848
Plaintiff:
DR. RAJANI KANTH
Defendant:
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOCCHINO v. CITY OF WILDWOOD et al
as 1:2024cv05225
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BOCCHINO
Defendant:
CITY OF WILDWOOD, WILDWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF ROBERT REGALBUTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUDSON et al v. MCGLYNN et al
as 1:2024cv06729
Plaintiff:
SHAWNIQUE HUDSON and LEONARD OGLESBY
Defendant:
ANN MCGLYNN and ATLANTIC CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PALIN v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2024cv06747
Plaintiff:
TANAJZA PALIN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, PATRICK J. CALLAHAN, L. BADIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
STIER, ESQ v. POSSEBON et al
as 3:2024cv04647
Defendant:
TW BRASIL LTDA, EMPIRE STRONG INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INTERMEDIATION, LLC, DIEGO POSSEBON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN H. STIER, ESQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
PINCK v. SOMERSET PROBATION
as 3:2024cv06686
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY PINCK
Defendant:
SOMERSET PROBATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
