Cases 1 - 7 of 7
LIEBOWITZ et al v. CHANGE ACADEMY LAKE OF OZARKS et al
as 2:2021cv16790
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL LIEBOWITZ, IRA LIEBOWITZ and N. LIEBOWITZ
Defendant:
CHANGE ACADEMY LAKE OF OZARKS, EMBARK BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAX FRANCHISING, LLC et al v. DEMARTINO
as 3:2021cv14307
Plaintiff:
MAX FRANCHISING, LLC and MAX IP, LLC
Defendant:
JOSEPH DEMARTINO doing business as The MAX CHALLENGE of Avon and ABC CORPS. 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLIED VISION GROUP, INC. v. LEFKOWITZ et al
as 2:2020cv02367
Defendant:
ENVISION EYE CARE, INC., PROVISION SUPPLY, LLC, ENVISION OPTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALLIED VISION GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
TAOBRANDS TRADE CO., LTD. v. MANUFACTS NOIR, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv18179
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, PAUL KIM, ABC CORPS 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
TAOBRANDS TRADE CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAPP-GRECCO COMPANY v. MV TECHNOLOGIES
as 2:2018cv15324
Plaintiff:
NAPP-GRECCO COMPANY
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
MV TECHNOLOGIES
3Rd Party Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, L.F. MANUFACTURING, INC., ABC CORPS. 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANDMAN v. AMBRUS et al
as 3:2017cv01841
Plaintiff:
DENNIS J. SANDMAN
Defendant:
ROBERT AMBRUS , FORTIS LUX FINANCIAL, ABC CORPS 1-5 and others
Cross_claimant:
ROBERT AMBRUS
Cross_defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and FORTIS LUX FINANCIAL
Counter_claimant:
ROBERT AMBRUS
Counter_defendant:
DENNIS J. SANDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WALTERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2010cv01792
Plaintiff:
JENNELL WALTERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, MEDICARE SECONDARY PAYOR RECOVERY CONTRACTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
