Cases 11 - 20 of 27
United States of America v. Gilbert
as 1:2015cv01768
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Melinda Lee Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
KEON HEE LEE v. BSI FINANCIAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2015cv01797
Plaintiff:
KEON HEE LEE
Defendant:
BSI FINANCIAL SERVICES, OHA NEWBURY VENTURES LP, VENTURES TRUST 2013-1-H-R (S3) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEE v. BOFI FEDERAL BANK, FSB et al
as 2:2015cv00498
Plaintiff:
CHEUN K. LEE
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and BOFI FEDERAL BANK, FSB.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. LEE et al
as 3:2014cv04432
Plaintiff:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Defendant:
SANG JIK LEE, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. AS NOMINEE FOR COUNTRYWIDE BANK, N.A., STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MAHARAJ v. SIEGEL
as 2:2013cv07600
Plaintiff:
SHANTEE MAHARAJ
Defendant:
LEE M. SIEGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ZERA
as 5:2013cv05265
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SHERRY LEE ZERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS
as 2:2013cv00777
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TAMMY LEE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
EverBank v. Lee
as 3:2013cv00572
Plaintiff:
EverBank
Defendant:
Elizabeth Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
ARCH BAY HOLDINGS, LLC- SERIES 2010B v. HEIDINGER et al
as 2:2013cv01227
Plaintiff:
ARCH BAY HOLDINGS, LLC- SERIES 2010B
Defendant:
REGINA R. HEIDINGER, HEIDINGER, DEMETRIA GUIUAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
United States Of America v. Brosius et al
as 1:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Lisa C. Brosius and Jan Lee Brosius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471 Declaratory & Injunctive Relief - Foreclo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
