Cases 101 - 110 of 665
PETITION OF LESLIE WILLIS TO PERPETUATE EVIDENCE PERTAINING TO THE TRUST FOR ANNIE PEARL (WHITE) WILLIS
as 2:2020cv01833
In Re:
PETITION OF LESLIE WILLIS TO PERPETUATE EVIDENCE PERTAINING TO 'THE TRUST FOR ANNIE PEARL (WHITE) WILLIS'
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopper et al v. Chang et al
as 2:2020cv05727
Plaintiff:
John Hopper and Erica Hopper
Defendant:
Daniel Sullivan and Sookyung Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HONKALA et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2020cv06568
Plaintiff:
J DOE & A DOE AND THEIR MINORS, JENNIFER BENNETCH, POOR PEOPLE'S ECONOMIC HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY BEN CARSON, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT and BLM COMPANIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA et al v. KEYSTONE FIRE PROTECTION CO.
as 2:2020cv05456
Plaintiff:
MANOR GLEN APARTMENTS, EVANGELICAL SENIOR HOUSING and TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEYSTONE FIRE PROTECTION CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kircher et al v. Henry
as 3:2020cv02033
Defendant:
Catherine Henry
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kircher and Doreen Heluk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. Kay Parkview LLC
as 5:2020cv06187
Defendant:
Kay Builders Inc and Kay Parkview LLC
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capriotti v. THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 2:2020cv06015
Defendant:
THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Plaintiff:
Erin Capriotti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WARIDI v. DADAY
as 2:2020cv06083
Plaintiff:
ZENOBIA WARIDI
Defendant:
ROBERT P. DADAY A PUBLIC CORPORATION doing business as ACTING AGENT FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CHELTENHAM
VELAZQUEZ
as 2:2020cv05211
In Re:
RAFAEL DAMIAN MOJICA VELAZQUEZ, RAFAEL MOJICA VELAZQUEZ, RAFAEL D. MOJICA VELAZQUEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
