Cases 1 - 8 of 8
PITTSBURGH CRUISE LINES, INC.
as 2:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
PITTSBURGH CRUISE LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
KENNEDY et al v. HOEGH AUTOLINERS, INC et al
as 2:2018cv08599
Defendant:
HOEGH AUTOLINERS, INC , HOEGH AUTOLINERS MANAGEMENT AS and MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, INC.
Plaintiff:
BARBARA KENNEDY and ALFATAH KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. SUNOCO, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05512
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH JOHNSON and LOIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
SUNOCO, INC. , RADIATOR SPECIALTY COMPANY, UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Suits In Admiralty Act
DE JESUS v. MAERSK LINE LIMITED et al
as 2:2010cv05331
Plaintiff:
SANTIAGO DE JESUS
Defendant:
MAERSK LINE LIMITED, FARRELL LINES, INC. and E-SHIPS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WITTENBERG et al v. CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv03717
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WITTENBERG and DOROTHY WITTENBERG
Defendant:
CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION, CROWLEY LINER SERVICES, INC., MARINE TRANSPORT LINES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31301 -31343 Maritime Commercial Instruments and Liens Act
KRANEK v. AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00963
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN KRANEK and CHRISTIAN KRANEK
Defendant:
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., AEP RIVER OPERATIONS, LLC, AEP MEMCO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CHINA EXPORT & CREDIT INSURANCE CORPORATION et al v. GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv04051
Plaintiff:
CHINA EXPORT & CREDIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and ANHUI TECHNOLOGY IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD.
Defendant:
GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., GLOBAL CONTAINER LINE, INC., MJT IMPORTS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WIT v. AMERICAN CRUSE LINES, INC.
as 2:2007cv01484
Plaintiff:
ELAINE S. WIT and ELAINE S. WIT
Defendant:
AMERICAN CRUISE LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
