Cases 1 - 10 of 18
MILLER v. MEJIA et al
as 2:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
JASON MILLER
Defendant:
GERMAN M MEIJA, ACRO PAINTING AND REMODLEING LLC, GERMAN M. MEJIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WEST et al v. AIRTIME EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
ALBERT WEST and JOY ROGERS WEST
Defendant:
AIRTIME EXPRESS, INC., UMIDJON ISMATOV, FELIX GUZMAN and others
Cross Defendant:
FELIX E GUZMAN MEJIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal- Personal Injury
Mejia v. Kondisko
as 2:2020cv04510
Defendant:
Jason Kondisko
Plaintiff:
Flor Angel Lantigua Mejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Mejia v. Kondisko
as 5:2020cv04510
Defendant:
Jason Kondisko
Plaintiff:
Flor Angel Lantigua Mejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
GONZALEZ et al v. BRECEUS et al
as 2:2019cv19361
Defendant:
JOSEPH P. BRECEUS, ELAINE DAMIAN, RICHARD ROES and others
Plaintiff:
KEILA MEJIA-ROJAS and ESMIRNA GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
GONZALEZ et al v. BRECEUS et al
as 3:2019cv19361
Defendant:
JOSEPH P. BRECEUS, ELAINE DAMIAN, ABC COMPANIES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
KEILA MEJIA-ROJAS and ESMIRNA GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Purisic v. Mejia
as 3:2019cv00294
Plaintiff:
Amela Purisic
Defendant:
Starlin Santana Mejia
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
GOMEZ v. ARISTIZABAL-RENGI et al
as 2:2018cv17424
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
CRISTIAN ARISTIZABAL-RENGI and L & E Express, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jose Gomez
Defendant:
ABC COMPANIES 1-10, RAFAEL A. BAEZ-MEJIA, C&G Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOMINGUEZ v. BAEZ-MEJIA et al
as 2:2018cv14981
Defendant:
CRISTIAN ARISTIZABAL-RENGI, J&E EXPRESS, LLC, RAFAEL A. BAEZ-MEJIA and others
Plaintiff:
ABEL DOMINGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEJIA et al v. KING
as 5:2018cv03787
Plaintiff:
CESAR MEJIA and ANA MEJIA
Defendant:
DANIEL S. KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
