Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Oliver v. THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Janice Oliver
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Oliver et al v. Bennett et al
as 3:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
Briana Oliver and Jesse Horos
Defendant:
Byng Bennett and Gran Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KABABA v. SALAZAR et al
as 2:2021cv01041
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I-V, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., WILLIAM S JONES and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN E KABABA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
OLIVER v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv01291
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH OLIVER
Defendant:
GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OLIVER v. COX GARAGE DOORS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01573
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. OLIVER
Defendant:
APRIL MARIE LEMMON and COX GARAGE DOORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NARAIN et al v. RHODEN et al
as 2:2019cv09771
Plaintiff:
DATARAM NARAIN, KATELYN NARAIN and SHELLY NARAIN
Defendant:
OLIVER RHODEN and NEW PRIME INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS-OLIVE v. CAMPBELL
as 2:2016cv03917
Plaintiff:
DIANE MORRIS-OLIVE
Defendant:
BRANDON CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANUSIONWU v. RICE et al
as 2:2016cv02502
Plaintiff:
OLIVER ANUSIONWU
Defendant:
MICHAEL RICE, CHERYL NORMAL, ROBERT DIEMIDIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BURNETTE et al v. SHIMP
as 1:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
DAVID BURNETTE and DEHN OLIVER-BURNETTE
Defendant:
IVAN E. SHIMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KUDAY et al v. WOODS et al
as 2:2014cv03911
Plaintiff:
NAZMIYE KUDAY , SELMA TASKAYA , E.T. and others
Defendant:
OLIVER G. WOODS, SWIFT TRANSPORTATION , JOHN DOE #1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
