Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Campbell v. Fawber et al
as 1:2011cv01215
Plaintiff:
Callan Campbell
Defendant:
Holly Fawber and General Motors Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Taft v. General Motors Corporation
as 3:2008cv02142
Plaintiff:
Burton Taft and Burton Taft
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KISON et al v. IANNONE et al
as 2:2008cv00582
Plaintiff:
LORRIE KISON and FREDERICK KISON
Defendant:
JOAN B. DACONES IANNONE, JAMES DEBBOLO and GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Natividad Saez v. Gen Mtr Corp
as 08-1334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIVIDAD SAEZ and MARY JO SAEZ, his wife
Defendant - Appellee:
BUICK MOTORS CORP, A Division of General Motors Corporation d/b/a and also known as Buick Motor Cars (individually, jointly and severally) and GM CORP, A Division of General Motors Corporation d/b/a and also known as Buick Motor Cars (individually, jointly and severally)
MCCRACKEN v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv02019
Plaintiff:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, G. RICHARD WAGONER, JR., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BERRY et al v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00258
Plaintiff:
KHADIJHA BERRY and DANA GUNNELL
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (GM), CHEVROLET DIVISION, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (GM), CHEVROLET DIVISION, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (GM), CHEVROLET DIVISION and others
Cross Claimant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (GM), CHEVROLET DIVISION, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (GM), CHEVROLET DIVISION, NEW UNITED MOTOR MANUFACTURING, INC. (NUMMI) and others
Cross Defendant:
DOREL JUVENILE GROUP, INC., DOREL JUVENILE GROUP, INC., DOREL JUVENILE GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
