Cases 1 - 10 of 12
DOE v. WALGREEN NATIONAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv20236
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
WALGREEN NATIONAL CORPORATION, WALGREEN STORES, INC., WALGREEN EASTERN COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McManus v. WALGREENS COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv02412
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph McManus
Defendant:
WALGREENS COMPANY and Bilco Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAIRNS et al v. WALGREEN COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv01925
Plaintiff:
DENISE CAIRNS and GEORGE CAIRNS
Defendant:
WALGREEN COMPANY , WALGREEN EASTERN CO., INC. and DCWI SIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAND v. WALGREENS et al
as 2:2015cv02556
Plaintiff:
CONSADENA HAND
Defendant:
WALGREENS , WALGREENS FAMILY OF COMPANIES and WALGREENS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WILLIAMS v. THE WALGREEN COMPANY
as 2:2015cv00157
Plaintiff:
ALICEIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THE WALGREEN COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DE BARNES v. WALGREENS - STORE NO. 6367 et al
as 2:2014cv05446
Plaintiff:
TANIA NEPOMUCENO DE BARNES
Defendant:
WALGREENS - STORE NO. 6367 and WALGREENS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
DEBOSE v. MCNEIL-PPC, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv03027
Plaintiff:
ANGELA W. DEBOSE
Defendant:
MCNEIL-PPC, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and THE WALGREEN COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MICHAEL et al v. WALGREEN COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv06680
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL and MARY MICHAEL
Defendant:
WALGREEN COMPANY , WALGREEN'S , WALGREEN'S PHARMACY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BURNETT v. WALGREEN COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv04064
Plaintiff:
DENISE BURNETT
Defendant:
WALGREEN COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
REYNOLDS et al v. WALGREEN COMPANY
as 2:2011cv00744
Plaintiff:
JOHN REYNOLDS and LAUREL FAYE REYNOLDS
Defendant:
WALGREEN COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
