Cases 21 - 28 of 28
COBB et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv05095
Plaintiff:
DONNA F. COBB , GARY COOPER , JAMES FRANK and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LIDDELL v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80528
Plaintiff:
GLENN LIDDELL
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, ROCK WOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BACK et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv02998
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA BACK , JEFFREY BAILEY , EMMA BARRY and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GILES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv06174
Plaintiff:
GLENN GILES and GLENN GILES
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ted McCracken v. ConocoPhillip
as 09-1800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS, RP, INTL BIO ANALYTICAL IND INC, GLENN A COX, President ConocoPhilips and others
SMITH et al v. SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv05591
Plaintiff:
CAROL ANN SMITH, MARIA FELTNER, VICTOR KENASK and others
Defendant:
SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION, XYZ COMPANIES I-X and JOHN DOES I-X
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Colleen Grobelny, et al v. Baxter Healthcare, et al
as 08-3475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLLEEN MARY GROBELNY and ROBERT GROBELNY
Defendant - Appellee:
AMER RED CROSS and BAXTER HEALTHCARE
Defendant:
GLENN DUBOV and ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
MCCRACKEN v. CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv02039
Plaintiff:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, INTERNATIONAL BIO-ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC., GLENN A. COX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
