Cases 81 - 90 of 112
HOUGH et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01892
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY ANN HOUGH and JASON HOUGH
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC., BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GULLEY et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as 2:2014cv06419
Plaintiff:
KELLY GULLEY and JOHN GULLEY
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY, ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOX v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02790
Plaintiff:
NORMA FOX
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC., SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS and TISSUE SCIENCE LABORATORIES LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FAIR et al v. C.R. BARD INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01369
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA FAIR and WILEY C. FAIR
Defendant:
C.R. BARD INC., COVIDIEN PLC, COVIDIEN LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTLER v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00623
Plaintiff:
BARBARA BUTLER
Defendant:
DAVOL, INC., C.R. BARD, INC. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YANALIVICH v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01818
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL YANALIVICH
Defendant:
DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEISENBORN v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07480
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY WEISENBORN
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and TISSUE SCIENCE LABORATORIES LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SWANSON v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07216
Plaintiff:
HEATHER SWANSON
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. , C.R. BARD, INC. and TISSUE SCIENCE LABORATORIES LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOUTWELL et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07173
Plaintiff:
DEBORA BOUTWELL and AARON BOUTWELL
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and TISSUE SCIENCE LABORATORIES LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINNIMORE et al v. C.R. BARD, INC.
as 2:2013cv07169
Plaintiff:
THERESA FINNIMORE and ROBERT FINNIMORE
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
