Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 8,232
HEDRICK et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00476
Plaintiff: ROBERT HEDRICK and CAROL HEDRICK
Defendant: A.O. SMITH CORP , A.W. CHESTERTON, INC., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant: METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. , EATON CORPORATION , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant: A.O. SMITH CORP , A.W. CHESTERTON, INC., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
In Re: Asbestos Products Liab, et al
as 14-4155
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM E. CARPER
Defendant - Appellee: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, CBS CORP, f/k/a VIACOM, INC. SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CBS CORPORATION f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, VIACOM and others
Rose et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff: David Rose and Freda Rose
Defendant: Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant: Honeywell International Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PRIEST et al v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02697
Defendant: CBS CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC, LLC, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Arbitrator: MAURICE J. GALLIPOLI
Cross Defendant: LEON C. PRIEST, SHARON M. PRIEST and JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 26-50 (fictitious)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
DAMON et al v. CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02026
Plaintiff: CALVIN DAMON and ROSEANNE DAMON
Defendant: CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. , AIREON MANUFACTURING CORP, ALCATEL-LUCENT and others
Cross_claimant: MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING
Cross_defendant: MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING , AIREON MANUFACTURING CORP, ALCATEL-LUCENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHECHO et al v. ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY et al
as 5:2014cv01342
Plaintiff: THOMAS N. CHECHO and ROSEMARY T. CHECHO
Defendant: ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, BEAZER EAST, BELDEN MANUFACTURING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LENIG v. CLEAVER BROOKS COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07645
Plaintiff: ROBERT D. LENIG
Defendant: CLEAVER BROOKS COMPANY, INC. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF and others
Cross_claimant: ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. , GOULDS PUMPS INC. and others
Cross_defendant: ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF , AMCHEM PRODUCTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Baldwin v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01986
Plaintiff: Paula Baldwin
Defendant: Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Bird Inc.
Cross_defendant: Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Counter_claimant: Oakfabco Inc.
Counter_defendant: Oakfabco Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tallman v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01828
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Tallman
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: Genuine Parts Company , IMO Industries Inc. , SB Decking Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: Genuine Parts Company , 84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
KING et al v. ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv06106
Plaintiff: ROLAND KING and HELEN KING
Defendant: ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY , ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF , ARVIN MERITOR and others
Cross_claimant: ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY and MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING
Cross_defendant: ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY , ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF , BECK/ARNLEY WORLDPARTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?