Cases 11 - 20 of 68
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ABELE
as 2:2022cv02501
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEITH M. ABELE
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BILLUPS
as 2:2022cv02502
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES T. BILLUPS
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AMERICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02344
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AMERICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC., AHF MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, AHF MONTGOMERY INC. D/B/A CHELTENHAM NURSING AND REHAB CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Newman v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
Shantell Newman and Shantell D. Newman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BADDICK, III
as 3:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PETER J. BADDICK, III
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SPIVACK et al
as 2:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MITCHELL SPIVACK, SPIVACK, INC. doing business as d/b/a VERREE PHARMACY, TODD GOODMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WARREN
as 2:2021cv04511
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TIMOTHY D. WARREN and TITAN MEDICAL COMPLIANCE, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARCHER
as 2:2021cv04263
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANALISE ARCHER
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
UNITED STATES v. KING
as 1:2021cv07321
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JOHN D KING
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Purcell et al v. Blust
as 2:2021mc00022
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GROOME, CHRIS PURCELL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Linda Blust
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
