Cases 1 - 10 of 19
QUINTAL v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2024cv02385
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH QUINTAL
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, CHRISTOPHER ABBOTT, JARRED BURNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RANDOLPH v. ACT #2 CHRISTIAN TRANSITIONAL SERVICES, ET AL. et al
as 2:2023cv02486
Plaintiff:
TABETHA RANDOLPH
Defendant:
ACT #2 CHRISTIAN TRANSITIONAL SERVICES, ET AL., SALVATION ARMY GREATER and STATION HOUSE TRANSITION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stilp v. City of Pottsville et al
as 3:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Eugene Stilp
Defendant:
City of Pottsville and Jonathan D Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randolph v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Samuel Randolph
Defendant:
City of Harrisburg, Robert Fegan, Donald Heffner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dent v. Randolph
as 1:2021cv01814
Plaintiff:
Preston Dent
Defendant:
Samira Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Turgeon et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Defendant:
Jeannine Turgeon, Carrie Shanahan, Aishah Callaway and others
Plaintiff:
Samira Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph-Ali v. Commonwealth of PA
as 1:2019cv01073
Plaintiff:
Samira Randolph-Ali
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M.M., Parent and Natural Guardian of C.C., a minor v. School District Of The City Of York et al
as 1:2019cv00623
Defendant:
Randolph Hernandez and School District Of The City Of York
Plaintiff:
M.M., Parent and Natural Guardian of C.C., a minor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
as 2:2019cv01430
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant:
WILLIAM CALLAHAN, GEORGE D. MULLIGAN, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Dobson
as 1:2018cv01850
Defendant:
Heather Dobson
Plaintiff:
Samira Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
