Other Civil Rights Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
BLIESATH v. DEJESUS
as 5:2023cv04869
Plaintiff: JADIN MICHAEL BLIESATH
Defendant: OFFICER MISSAEL DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEJESUS JR. et al v. SANTIAGO et al
as 2:2023cv03424
Plaintiff: ANGEL L. DEJESUS JR. and CAROLINE MORALES
Defendant: LOUIS SANTIAGO, MATTHEW KARNISH, ALEXANDER BOEHM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEJESUS JR. et al v. SANTIAGO et al
as 5:2023cv03424
Plaintiff: ANGEL L. DEJESUS JR. and CAROLINE MORALES
Defendant: LOUIS SANTIAGO, MATTHEW KARNISH, ALEXANDER BOEHM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeJesus v. Service Employees International Union, Local 668 et al
as 1:2022cv01012
Plaintiff: Magdalena DeJesus
Defendant: Service Employees International Union, Local 668 and Stephen Catanese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TURMAN v. DEJESUS et al
as 5:2018cv02749
Defendant: THE CITY OF READING and OFFICER MISSAEL DEJESUS
Plaintiff: SAMUEL LAMAR TURMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CINTRON-GARCIA v. SANTIAGO-DEJESUS et al
as 5:2018cv00456
Plaintiff: MARCELINA CINTRON-GARCIA
Defendant: JESUS SANTIAGO-DEJESUS, DANIEL T. WHITE, C. MORAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOTO v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2016cv06386
Plaintiff: CARLOS SOTO
Defendant: CITY OF READING , JESUS SANTIAGO-DEJESUS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJesus v. Loughman et al
as 1:2016cv02261
Plaintiff: Carl DeJesus
Defendant: Patrick Loughman, Spinolio and Dogan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEJESUS v. WEHRMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv04745
Plaintiff: LAZARO DEJESUS
Defendant: PAUL WEHRMAN, CRAIG BARRETT, CHRIS CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. SANTIAGO-DEJESUS
as 5:2016cv02689
Plaintiff: LAMAR LEWIS
Defendant: JESUS SANTIAGO-DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?