Cases 121 - 130 of 144
Long v. Adams County Department of Probation and Parole
as 3:2013cv01392
Petitioner:
Jeremy Long
Respondent:
Adams County Department of Probation and Parole and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santiago v. Saul
as 1:2013cv00749
Petitioner:
Dimas Santiago
Respondent:
Adam Saul and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv01346
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY ADAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2012cv01716
Petitioner:
Shawn Adams
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PEREZ-REYES v. CAMERON et al
as 5:2012cv04326
Petitioner:
RAUL A. PEREZ-REYES
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON, JOHN T. ADAMS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS CO., PA. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Holt
as 3:2012cv00099
Petitioner:
Adam Martin
Respondent:
Warden Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cruz v. Wagner et al
as 1:2011cv01473
Petitioner:
Samuel Cruz
Respondent:
Shawn Wagner, Adams County District Attorney, PA. Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GANNAWAY v. MARSH et al
as 5:2011cv04748
Petitioner:
SHAKUR D. GANNAWAY
Respondent:
ROBERT J. MARSH, JEFF A. HORTON, MARIROSA LAMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Martinez
as 3:2011cv00837
Respondent:
Martinez
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ADAMS v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2010cv05852
Petitioner:
JOHN K. ADAMS
Respondent:
RAYMOND LAWLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
