General Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Chen v. Zickefoose et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00098
Petitioner: John E. Chen
Respondent: Donna Zickefoose, Heath and Jenlah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HEATH v. HARMONDS
as 1:2013cv00274
Petitioner: JORDAN HEATH
Respondent: MCCLARY HARMONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HEATH v. FISHER
as 2:2013cv03802
Petitioner: DARRELL HEATH
Respondent: JON FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
QUICK v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03698
Petitioner: G. HEATH QUICK
Respondent: JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HEATH v. SCI FOREST We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00047
Petitioner: JORDAN HEATH, M.R.
Respondent: SCI FOREST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HEATH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv00895
Petitioner: PAUL Q. HEATH
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PATRICK F. DUGAN and WARDEN OF HOUSE OF CORRECTION PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HEATH v. CAHILL et al
as 2:2008cv01763
Petitioner: DARRELL M. HEATH
Respondent: MICHAEL CAHILL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HEATH v. SMEAL
as 2:2008cv01385
Petitioner: DARRELL HEATH
Respondent: PAUL K. SMEAL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HEATH v. CAHILL et al
as 2:2007cv04817
Petitioner: DARRELL M. HEATH
Respondent: MICHAEL CAHILL, THE UNKNOWN COMPLAINANT and DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. HEATH
as 2:2007cv03013
Petitioner: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent: DARRELL HEATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?