Cases 21 - 30 of 32
NEFF v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv03626
Petitioner:
VICTOR JOE NEFF
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DAUPHIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARTER v. MAZURKIEWICZ et al
as 2:2011cv06693
Petitioner:
MELVIN CARTER
Respondent:
JOE MAZURKIEWICZ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARTER v. MAZURKIEWICZ et al
as 2:2011cv01154
Petitioner:
MELVIN CARTER
Respondent:
JOE MAZURKIEWICZ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Braning et al
as 1:2010cv01771
Petitioner:
Rasheen Johnson
Respondent:
Joe Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peeples v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2010cv00995
Petitioner:
Joe Wallace Peeples
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fitzgerald v. Bellino et al
as 3:2010cv00667
Petitioner:
Darlene M. Fitzgerald
Respondent:
John Bellino, Cathy Stamets, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
LOUIS v. OBAMA et al
as 3:2009cv02241
Petitioner:
Lucner St. Louis
Respondent:
Barack Obama, Harley Lappin, Joe Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peters v. Nish et al
as 1:2008cv01923
Petitioner:
Clarence Peters
Respondent:
Joe Nish and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TRAVIS v. PHELPS et al
as 2:2008cv04183
Petitioner:
JOE L. TRAVIS
Respondent:
PHELPS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF BEAU BIDEN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ascenzi v. Nish et al
as 3:2008cv01418
Petitioner:
Michael J Ascenzi
Respondent:
Joe Nish and Attorney General (of) Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
