Cases 31 - 40 of 124
JOHONOSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 5:2014cv04905
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN JOHONOSON
Respondent:
BRIAN H. THOMPSON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHALINE KELLY FOR PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KELLY v. KERESTES et al
as 5:2014cv02613
Petitioner:
WAYNE CURTIS KELLY
Respondent:
KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly Bey v. Glunt et al
as 3:2014cv00125
Petitioner:
David F Kelly Bey
Respondent:
Steve Glunt and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCOY-GIBSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014cv00027
Petitioner:
KELLY MCCOY-GIBSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCDONALD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv06710
Petitioner:
MAURICE MCDONALD
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AUSTIN v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2013cv06226
Petitioner:
HASSAN AUSTIN
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, R. SETH WILLIAMS and LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHARDSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2013cv01466
Petitioner:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, JOHN E. WETZEL and LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOGAN v. MOONEY et al
as 1:2013cv02402
Petitioner:
ERIC ROMONT HOGAN
Respondent:
Mooney, STEFANIE J. SALAVANTIS and Linda Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JAMES v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2013cv05456
Petitioner:
GERLD JAMES
Respondent:
BRAIN V. COLEMAN and LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SANTANA v. THOMAS et al
as 5:2013cv05407
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL OCASIO SANTANA
Respondent:
JOHN THOMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
