Cases 41 - 50 of 61
MORRIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 3:2016cv00127
Petitioner:
JEFFREY A. MORRIS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. FPC Lewisburg
as 4:2015cv01198
Petitioner:
Wallace Morris
Respondent:
FPC Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MORRIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv01352
Petitioner:
ERNEST MORRIS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORRIS v. WYNER
as 2:2013cv07153
Petitioner:
DAVID MORRIS
Respondent:
JAMES WYNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRIS v. WALSH et al
as 2:2013cv06664
Petitioner:
DAVID MORRIS
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PENN. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENN.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORRIS v. WALSH et al
as 2:2013cv03721
Petitioner:
WALTER B. MORRIS
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALEY v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv01708
Petitioner:
MORRIS HALEY
Respondent:
COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warren v. Recktenwald
as 3:2012cv02059
Petitioner:
Morris J. Warren
Respondent:
Monica Recktenwald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MORRIS v. MAZURKIEWCZ et al
as 2:2010cv07174
Petitioner:
DEREYK MORRIS
Respondent:
JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWCZ, JR., THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DANTE MORRIS FOREIGN TRUST VESSEL v. UNITED STATES INC
as 2:2010cv03971
Petitioner:
DANTE MORRIS FOREIGN TRUST VESSEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
