Cases 1 - 10 of 106
KELLY v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv02114
Petitioner:
MARLIN KELLY
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BEAVER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KELLY v. TICE et al
as 2:2022cv03839
Petitioner:
JAMES KELLY
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PERMENTER v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv02892
Petitioner:
RYSHEEN PERMENTER
Respondent:
ERIC T. ARMEL, DEBORAH I. CARPENTER, JOHN J. TALABER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bey v. Bechtold et al
as 1:2021cv00607
Petitioner:
David F. Kelly Bey
Respondent:
William Bechtold, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Franklin County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bey v. Bechtold
as 1:2021cv00472
Petitioner:
David F. Kelly Bey
Respondent:
William Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GIBSON v. CARNEY
as 2:2021cv01153
Respondent:
BLANCHE CARNEY
Petitioner:
KELLY GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANDERSON et al v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 5:2020cv04170
Petitioner:
BERNARDINO TORRES and DONTAIE ANDERSON
Respondent:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JUDGE KELLY RANACH, JUDGE DOUGLAS REICHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brady v. Warden Federal Prison Camp Danbury, CT
as 3:2020cv00623
Plaintiff:
Kelly Brady
Respondent:
Warden Federal Prison Camp Danbury CT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kelly Bey v. Bechtold
as 1:2019cv01480
Petitioner:
David F. Kelly Bey
Respondent:
William Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kelly Bey v. Bechtold et al
as 1:2019cv01467
Petitioner:
David F. Kelly Bey
Respondent:
William Bechtold and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
