Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Stephen Mathies v. Paul Schultz
as 11-1958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN MATHIES
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Travis Denny v. Paul Schultz, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-1450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS DENNY
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL SCHULTZ and JAMES WATERFIELD
MATHIES v. SCHULTZ
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2010cv06314
Petitioner:
STEPHEN MATHIES
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON v. SCHULTZ
as 1:2010cv05037
Petitioner:
VINCENT JACKSON
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RODRIGUEZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv04755
Petitioner:
NESTOR RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANDERSON v. SCHULTZ
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2010cv03933
Petitioner:
RICHARD ANDERSON
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. SCHULTZ
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2010cv03637
Petitioner:
ROBERT SMITH
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marcus Williams v. Paul Schultz
as 10-2075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL SCHULTZ
VELEZ v. SCHULTZ
as 1:2010cv01726
Petitioner:
BENALDO VELEZ
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James McIntosh v. Paul Schultz, et al
as 10-1348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MCINTOSH
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL SCHULTZ, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.