Cases 91 - 100 of 209
Robinson v. Morris et al
as 1:2016cv00117
Plaintiff:
Eric Robinson
Defendant:
Sylvia Morris , Mindy Biser , Jay Whitesel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massaquoi v. Morris et al
as 3:2015cv02448
Plaintiff:
Manna Massaquoi
Defendant:
S. Morris, A. Himes, D. Woomer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Wireman et al
as 1:2015cv02254
Plaintiff:
Greg Johnson
Defendant:
Darrell Wireman , Morris L. Houser , James Eckard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Parker v. Rayford Means, et al
as 15-3592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYFORD A. MEANS, IN THEIOR OFFICIAL INDIVIDUAL AND PRIVATE CAPACITIES, MCLENDON, LENORA CLAYTON and others
PARKER v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CLERK OF COURT et al
as 2:2015cv05681
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weedon v. Adams et al
as 3:2015cv01990
Plaintiff:
Eric Weedon
Defendant:
Adams, Nathan D. Kaleta, Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. GILLARD et al
as 2:2015cv05430
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
MARK GILLARD, OFFICE OF JUDICIAL REC., MUNICIPALITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILA. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Parker v. Thomas Del Ricci, et al
as 15-3267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PARKER, MR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, JUDGE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE, RISA V. FURMAN, MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY and others
Jamie Elliott v. Grace, et al
as 15-2984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMIE ELLIOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. GRACE, Warden, SGT. WEAVERLING, C.O.I. HARMER and others
PARKER v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2015cv03891
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
SHAKA MZEE JOHNSON, RAYFORD A. MEANS, MCLENDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
