Cases 91 - 100 of 12,292
Beckett v. Closton et al
as 1:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Rahmik Beckett
Defendant:
Sgt. Closton, Correctional Officer Hall and Lt. Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BEN R. MICHAELS and JERRY M. HOBECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart-Richardson v. Sisley et al
as 1:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Corey Stewart-Richardson
Defendant:
George Sisley, Lt. Michael White and Shoemaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VARGAS v. MCCAULEY
as 2:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
ANGEL TERRELL VARGAS, JR.
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. MCCAULEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blalock v. Corley et al
as 3:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Karel Blalock
Defendant:
Lt. Corley, Lt. K.L. Strong, Captain A. Eberling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACOSTA v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv01570
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ACOSTA
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
v. STOCKTON et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Defendant:
RONALD STOCKTON, LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ZAPOLSKI v. GODEK et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. ZAPOLSKI
Defendant:
TROOPER RONALD GODEK, TROOPER KENT LOUCKS, GREGORY REICHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN, DEPUTY M-BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shears v. Jenks et al
as 1:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Daaron Shears
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Jenks and Correctional Officer Marker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
