Cases 101 - 110 of 12,321
DUNCAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DUNCAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LARRY KRASNER and JOSH MAYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Welch et al
as 1:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Cory Lewis
Defendant:
Jessica Jo Welch, Deborah Carpenter and Mike Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
KEITH A. COHEN
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP, BENSALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, BENSALEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
as 2:2024cv01846
Plaintiff:
JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: QUINZEL CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
QUINZEL CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KREASHKO v. GILPIN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2024cv00288
Defendant:
SOUTHERN ARMSTRONG REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, GILPIN TOWNSHIP, GILPIN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KREASHKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Quarles v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Allan Quarles
Defendant:
James Youngkin, Eric Wiltrout, C.O. Trouchin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valoy v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Orlando V. Valoy
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
HERRING v. KAUFFMAN
as 2:2024cv01867
Plaintiff:
TARAY HERRING
Defendant:
EARL G. KAUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAUGHTRY v. CEKADA et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
MARTIQUE DAUGHTRY
Defendant:
CO CEKADA, CO RANKIN, CO HERKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
