Cases 131 - 140 of 12,307
ACOSTA v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv01570
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ACOSTA
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
v. STOCKTON et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Defendant:
RONALD STOCKTON, LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ZAPOLSKI v. GODEK et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. ZAPOLSKI
Defendant:
TROOPER RONALD GODEK, TROOPER KENT LOUCKS, GREGORY REICHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN, DEPUTY M-BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shears v. Jenks et al
as 1:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Daaron Shears
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Jenks and Correctional Officer Marker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALONE v. EVITTS et al
as 2:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
CORNELL MALONE
Defendant:
ERIKA EVITTS, KELSEY FINIZIO and JOSEPH RYAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dorazio v. McGraw et al
as 3:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Nichole Dorazio, Nicole Dorazio, Nicole Mattioli and others
Defendant:
C.O. McGraw, C.O. Carolina, C.O. Samuel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Colon
as 4:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Wright
Defendant:
Melissa Colon and Eugene Eiden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: JOSEPH EUGENE MANDER III
as 2:2024cv00773
Not Yet Classified:
JOSEPH EUGENE MANDER, III
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLEY v. KOONS et al
as 2:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HOLLEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL KOONS and JOHN DOE/JANE DOE/ABC CORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
